FROM PHOENIX, ARIZONAAUSTRALIAN/NEW ZEALAND AFFAIRS
God Save the Queen? No, God Save the Citizen!
(From Her Majesty’s Servants)
Bryan Fyffe’s 18-year Battle with the “Law”
Subverting Australian “Democracy” to “Political/Secular Elite”
Ever Met the Ugly Australian?
5. Human Race Is Regressing, Bring on the Mushroom Cloud?
6. We Are
Living in Eschatological
Perth 7. Western Australians No Longer Innocent Until Proven GuiltyNov. 7, 2000
Sydney 8. Brian Fyffe Denied Bail, His Daughter ReportsNov. 11, 2000
Brisbane 9. PM Commits Australia to International SlaveryNov. 18, 2000
Sydney 10. The Asians Are ComingNov. 18, 2000
Auckland 11. Flight of the Kiwis: New Zealanders Flee Globalist InvasionNov. 20, 2000
1. God Save the Queen? No, God Save the Citizen! (From Her
MELBOURNE, Oct. 30 - Australian government officials boast about their country supposedly being a democracy. This implies a nation in which citizens are free to speak their minds and vote their conscience without interference by the government or other judicial authorities. From our past articles on Australian affairs (see our stories on mandatory bicycle helmets or the referendum on monarchy, for example, and TiM Bulletins Index - Australia/New Zealand for other articles on Aussie affairs), some regular TiM readers may already have inkling that the reality in that beautiful land Down Under is perhaps at a variance from the rosy pictures its officials and the establishment media paint.
Well, the latest correspondence we have received from several of Australian sources may help change the minds of the remaining doubting Thomas’s about the “freedoms” and “human rights” in Australia. And no, we’re not talking about the oft-cited alleged abuses of the Aborigine rights. We’ve received letters from ordinary white Australian citizens who say they were abused by the Australian government law enforcement agencies and the courts - for no apparent reason other than that they stood up for their rights, and refused to be shorn like the sheep by Her Majesty’s herdsmen.
Here’s the first such story, as told by the chief protagonist himself, Mr. Wolter Joosse, a horse-breeding farmer in the state of Victoria:
live with my family on a small farm of about 30 acres in the State of
Victoria, where we breed horses. We do not need any services but
electricity and phone. We subscribe to the Lord's water supply and are
fortunate to receive plenty from the skies to allow us to survive.
years ago, we suddenly received an account from a government body, though
incorporated, named South East Water Inc., that claimed a charge for
'drainage'. I wrote and suggested, that this must be a mistake since we
use no services of that kind.
then informed that this was related to water that spilled of our property
and went into State rivers and the like. I responded in turn that, since
we solely depend on the Lord's blessing, our property had been laser
graded in such way that all water would flow towards our dams, and as such
it would be unlikely, that any would run off our property. However, we
stated, should indeed some spill off, which was collected by you, we feel,
that since you charge others for water, that we in turn should be
compensated for the amount of our water, that you claim you are
we received a three page letter stating that the charge was not really for
drainage, but a levy to create and maintain wetlands, parks and gardens. I
responded that this was a noble cause, but in view of the fact that we
already were maintaining a 30 acre park, we felt that our contribution
ought to suffice.
years, we did not receive any more accounts. Until recently that is, when
the matter went to court. My defense had many rounds of ammunition, each
of them capable of winning the day, but...
I argued, that South East Water Inc.
was an agent allowed to collect monies for Parks and Water, a government
body. As such South East Water Inc. did not provide any service to me and
could not legally make any claims. Parks and Water, who claimed to provide
a service (?) would have to be the Claimant.
before a government body can issue a
contract, it is bound by law to seek tender for the contract.
However, South East Water Inc. was already named in the legislation
as being contracted by Park and Water prior to this body having the legal
right to claim any charges.
I argued that the legislation was invalid on the grounds that in 1975 the
State Government of Victoria "re-enacted" the Victorian
Constitution, without the knowledge or consent of the people. In doing so,
there must have been a point in time, when the Parliament had no longer
authority, as either the previous constitution was repealed or Victoria
was to have two Constitutions (!?).
the Constitution stated that when an alteration to the Constitution was
made, all Members of both Houses must be present at the second and third
readings of any such Bill. The official Journal of the Parliament, the
"Hansard", showed, however, that only 26 Members were in the
House to vote (15 for; 11 against).
Therefore, by operation of law, the Bill
could not possibly have been proceeded with and the "re-enacted"
Constitution was null and void.
it was argued by the Claimant argued that, by reason of law - s14 of the
Water Industry Act, 1994 - I was deemed to be under "contract"
and as such the charge was legal and binding. I asked the Magistrate if he
could possibly explain to me how I could enter into a "contract"
without my knowledge or consent, and how such contract could be legally
binding, when I did not know the terms and conditions of such contract???
I argued that since I had formally seceded from the Crown in right and
Parliament of Victoria, that I could not be the subject to the
legislation. British and Australian law states, that if a Parliament
dispenses with the law, the Parliament abdicates (see “The
Right to Secede” in the PS). The people, therefore, are absolved of
their allegiance thereto, and have the right, under international and
domestic law, to self-determination. More and more people in Australia are
seceding in attempt to escape the unauthorized authority of the defunct
outcome? The charge against me was
found proven, even though the Magistrate could not give me explanations in
law as to why my arguments failed, other then in saying "because I
have ruled so..!"
token of an apology to me, he stated: "Mr. Joosse, you should know
that there is no separation of powers in Victoria, I should know so,
because I was personally sacked by the Government. The Chief Magistrate
told me in no uncertain terms that separation of powers does not exist in
the State of Victoria."
I replied: “Your Worship, that is indeed a very sad situation, since
that denies the people of Victoria their legal right, which is inviolable,
to an independent tribunal.”
Magistrate said to the Claimants solicitor, "I hope you are not going
to ask for costs, because I think that I can speak for both of us, that we
have learnt a lot this morning from Mr. Joosse.
It has been most educational".
of course, costs were sought, nearly $ 2,000.00. I pointed out to the
Magistrate, that the Government instructing private law firms to prosecute
the people was yet another form of intimidation. By allowing these private
law firms to charge whatever they fancied, the government tries to
intimidate the people, by way of costs, from standing up for their rights. Those who are standing up to
the forces of Satan and Lucifer do so without funding, and have done so
Dear Bob, (as you can see), here in Australia we are fighting the forces
of Satan and Lucifer. As British subjects, we are meant to be under the
protection of the Queen (of King), and as such under the protection of
God. The Coronation Oaths Act, 1688, prescribes that the Queen swears to
uphold the Natural Law and the True Profession of the Gospel. As such
everyone, who swears allegiance to the Crown has the duty and care of that
oath. In plain English that means that no law made by man can overrule the
laws of God. It would be inconceivable to imagine that a Muslim government
could violate the Koran, yet our governments habitually violate the Bible.
agents of Satan and Lucifer, who are entrenched in upper levels of
government, have taken advantage of the ignorance of the people, and now
rule them by bluff and intimidation. These evil forces are not large in
numbers, but hold the top positions in both government and opposition. It
does not matter, which one gets elected, and as such our voting system has
been altered to ensure that only one of the parties can come into
government, or hold the balance. It is only when you start to look that
nothing hangs legally together, but with the courts firmly under the
control of the governments (they appoint the judges) and solicitors being
agents of the court and in fear thereof, the ordinary people have
virtually no hope and are at the mercy of these evil forces, without
number of years now, I have been researching the legal status of our
system, and with the help of others (some who have spent up to 20 years
full time on this) we can prove without doubt that those who govern us
have no valid authority. To prove that is not difficult, and maybe a
thousand different arguments can do just that. However, to find a solution
which will allow it to be corrected without the nation plunging into chaos
is of course more difficult, and many who would like to see the power
returned to the people are hesitant to give us support in fear of what
might be the fall out.
recently, I found the perfect solution, which would bring back the power
to the people, keep law and order, and in general will allow life to go on
as normal without any adverse effects to either people or businesses (see “The
Right to Secede” in the PS).
lost many battles, but are winning the war. Good must and will conquer
over evil. It is difficult for us to get our message out as it is all done
voluntarily and without funding. We struggle when equipment breaks down,
or when we run out of paper. We are most alarmed about the lack of
interest from established churches within Australia. The violations that
we speak about ought to be of major concern to all who believe in God,
since they violate God's laws.
in a separate e-mail forward further documents for your perusal. Thanks
for your interest and concern.
Joosse, Victoria, Australia
Attached please find some documents which were prepared by Mr James
Renton, Barrister and Solicitor. Mr Renton has researched the validity, or
lack of, our legal system for nearly 20 years.
RIGHT TO SECEDE
right to secede is not automatic. The citizens of Australia have a duty of
allegiance to the temporal sovereign, being the Crown and the Government
of the Commonwealth, and the Crown and the Government of a citizen’s
State residence. If a government violates the fundamental rights of the
citizens, it abdicates government and the citizens are absolved of their
allegiance thereto. This has happened to the Commonwealth and State
governments, by virtue of the application of the Bill
of Rights, 1688 (Annexure A), as follows:
1. those governments habitually
dispensed with the constitutional rights of the people, without the
consent of the Parliament of Westminster;
4. those governments habitually
levied taxes against the people, without the consent of the Parliament of
6. those governments habitually
disarmed the people;
12. those governments habitually
granted possession of the people’s means of production tom bankers,
without due process of law.
The Bill of Rights cannot be dispersed with by a parliament (the Statute
of Monopolies, 1623: Annexure B), nor by the executive (the Petition
of Rights, 1628: Annexure C), nor by the judiciary (the Habeous
Corpus Act, 1640: Annexure D), and it is the law of Victoria
(Annexure E), New South Wales (Annexure F), and Queensland
(Annexure G), and by virtue of Section
118 of the Constitution, it is the law of the Commonwealth
(Annexure H), and by virtue of Section
24 of the Australian Courts
Act, 1842 (UK), the law of the other States.
government abdicates, the citizens have the right to secede and escape the
usurped jurisdiction of the former Officers of the defunct government, by
virtue of Article 1.1 of
the International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights, 1966, which is the law of Australia by
virtue of the application of Sections
3 and 6 of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act, 1986 (Annexure I)
citizens have seceded, they have the right to form a new nation, or join a
new nation, by the virtue of the application of Article
5 (d) (iii) of the International
Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination, 1965, which is the law of Australia by virtue
of the application of Section 3,
6 and 7 of the Racial
Discrimination Act, 1975 (Annexure J)
nation is entitled to have the former Officers of the defunct governments
respect it’s territorial integrity and political independence, by virtue
of the application of Articles
1.2 and 2.4 of the Charter of the United Nations, which is the
law of Australia by virtue of the application of Section
3 of the Charter of the United
Nations Act, 1945 (Annexure K)
above laws, both domestic and international, are binding upon the
former Officers of the defunct government by virtue of the application of Section 5 of the Commonwealth
of Australia Constitution Act, 1900.
Bryan Fyffe’s 18-year Battle with the “Law”
SYDNEY, Oct. 25 - So you think Mr. Wolter Joosse’s troubles with the Australian government are an isolated case? Think again, after reading the following correspondence we have received from Brigitte Straulino, president of the One Voice - One People, an independent, non-profit organization based on Sydney:
Sir, I would like to introduce our human rights organization. We are
trying to give silenced victims of human rights abuse a voice. Please
check our website http://onevoice.freeservers.com/
where we have listed some cases, including a short history of the Brian
Fyffe case. Ten of these cases have been filed with the UN Human Rights
Commission, including Brian Fyffe s case. History written by Brian Fyffe a
letter which has been sent by us to more than 30 Politicians (Ministers,
Senators, Members of the House of Representatives etc)/
following statement by Mason CJ, previous Chief Justice of the High Court
of Australia, is self-explanatory: "Every democratic,
industrialized country except Australia has legal protection of rights,
including the right to equality, of on kind or another".
you can help us to expose what is really happening in Australia, you would
help a lot. Thank your and best regards.
Straulino, President One Voice - One People, Human Rights Defenders
TiM Ed.: Among the
information Ms. Straulino had enclosed about Mr. Fyffe’s case was the
following brief summary. As
in Mr. Joosse’s case, everything started innocently enough.
For Mr. Fyffe, however, the initial bulldozer incident has turned
into an 18-year nightmare:
Fyffe was operating a bulldozer when it suddenly caught alight and was
badly damaged by fire. Brian Fyffe had the bulldozer insured with the
insurance company of the State of Victoria at the time of the fire, but
the State of Victoria refused to pay for the damage.
matter went eventually to court, where Mr. Fyffe was awarded the $130,000
the machine was insured for and also $107,000 in interest. It was three
years after the fire before the case was heard in court. Despite the fact
Mr. Fyffe had won the claim the insurer (State of Victoria) would not
settle and another year passed. Because of the matter being dragged out
and the late payment of the insurance Mr. Fyffe was in a situation where
he had no "tools of trade" and could not pay for new ones. This
damage done to his business was never accounted for by the courts.
the insurance claim finally settled, most of the money went on interest
payments to the banks. Some of the interest rates these banks were
charging him was as high as 25%. Mr. Fyffe offered to payout the bank loan
but the bank would not agree to this.
time later, the police of the State of Victoria and the Special Operations
Group raided Mr. Fyffe's property. A forensic bomb expert alleged that Mr.
Fyffe had sent a letter bomb to the bank. (It has only come to light
recently that the evidence of this 'bomb expert' has been discredited and
that he has been dismissed from his official job as forensic scientist).
the raid the police took some modified clocks and batteries as evidence
for "making bombs". The clocks were being modified at the time,
for automatic control of the irrigation system on the farm.
weeks later, a 27 man strong police force, the Special Operations Group,
the media, helicopters, horses, dogs and their owners marched on Mr.
Fyffe’s land. Mr. Fyffe was
not at home. The police arrested Mr. Fyffe's wife and took her to the
police station, charged her and then released her. (Mr. Fyffe's son, who
was 17 years old at the time, was not charged until two months later when
he had turned 18.)
at his home, Mr. Fyffe was also interviewed and arrested, and then held
without bail for 10 months. He faced charges of 18 serious criminal
offences, all being dismissed at the committal hearing as the Judges found
the evidence to be untrue and unsubstantiated. The charges against his
wife were also dropped at this hearing. The police later re-instated the
charges again her. The police also dropped two of the three charges
against his son but later re-instated them.
Fyffe was charged with yet another three offences, convicted, but later
appealed this conviction, a week after he was released from jail. Two of
these three charges were dismissed but the remaining charge, possession of
explosives under suspicious circumstances, being the alarm clocks, was
upheld. The alarm clocks, which had no explosives or detonators, were the
only things that were found on Mr. Fyffe's property. The Victorian Police
found no other items during their thorough search. The State of Victoria
has not cleared this matter through the courts presumably because they
know that they have caused loss and damages to the Fyffe family for no
Fyffe's farm was auctioned off and bought by the State of Victoria during
the period that Mr. Fyffe was held in custody and could not prevent the
unjustified auction. Mr. Fyffe alleged, against the State of Victoria,
that the charges against him were fabricated, that holding him without
bail for 10 months was illegal, that the fire sale of his property was
suspicious and that he was entitled to be compensated for the way he was
treated, for the defamation of himself and his family and for the
traumatic experience they suffered.
his eight appearances in the Supreme Court of Victoria and one in the High
Court of Australia none of the matters raised have ever been answered and
he consequently lodged complaints with the UNHRC over the gross violations
of his human rights.
in detention for 10 months on flimsy and unjustified grounds, it would
appear that the detention was in revenge for his stand against the State
insurance office. This detention robbed him of his farm and his income and
defamed his and his family reputation.
Fyffe's application for Special Leave to Appeal to the High Court of
Australia has been refused by the High Court, and the State of Victoria is
now adamant that the Fyffe family will be removed from their farm soon.
Oct. 10, 2000, the Fyffe family experienced yet another police raid on
after dark (8 p.m.), an approximately 60-men strong force, consisting of
the police, sheriff's officers and Police Special Operations Group,
appeared on his land. Brian Fyffe was handcuffed, arrested and charged
with making threats to kill and with multiple firearm offences as it was
alleged that guns were found on his property.
previous police raid - conducted by the Special Operations Group and
attended by the media, helicopters, horses and dogs - the police found
modified clocks and batteries in the house. Brian Fyffe was charged with
possession of explosives under suspicious circumstances, referring to the
alarm clocks. His family was also arrested (see the details of Brian
Fyffe’s own testimony at web site).
clocks found on Brian Fyffe's property were being modified by the youngest
son, Joe, who was an apprentice diesel mechanic at the time, for use as
watchdogs on diesel irrigation motors.
This was done for the purpose that the clocks can shut down a motor
at a certain time in the night, without someone having to get out of bed.
Fyffe was held without bail in custody without a trial for 10 months. 18
serious criminal offences were dropped when the matter was finally heard.
The charges for possession of explosives under suspicious circumstances
were upheld despite that no evidence of explosives, detonators or anything
connected with explosives had been found on the property.
Although it turned out in the end that the Fyffe family suffered a
wrong the Australian Government refused to compensate him.
are the implications of the Fyffe case in Australia?
indeed an alarming situation in Australia due to the precedent set by this
The legal authorities in Australia
must find any one in the possession of an alarm clock or a similar device
guilty of having the intention to build a bomb in order to avoid
People in disputes with their
business partners, neighbors or with banks, governments, government
departments, or any other Australian authority, when found in possession
of alarm clocks or similar devices are guilty of being potential bombers
and a serious threat to the national security.
Consequently every civil court case
in Australia where the parties are in possession of alarm clocks or
similar devices becomes a criminal matter and in some states is subject to
Considering the amount of alarm
clocks and similar devices in use in Australia, this country is in danger
to develop into a convict nation.
the Australian Government appoints a Minister with portfolio for alarm
clocks and similar devices and legislates retrospectively the possession
and the use of the above via licensing (like guns), Brian Fyffe is
entitled to an effective remedy for the violation of his rights under the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
however a sad fact that human rights are not implemented into the law in
Australia such failure causing the country to be an outsider by modern
Fyffe’s case is just one of many serious cases of human rights abuse
OVOP has forwarded to the UNHRC and published on the Internet.”
(Also see http://onevoice.freeservers.com/case11.htm).
TiM Ed.: The
foregoing two cases suggest that the next time Australians are asked to
hail “God Save the Queen,” they may want to chant instead, “God Save
the Citizen!” Fom Her Majesty’s servants, of course.
And then check out Mr. Joosse’s idea about how to secede from a
government that has already allegedly violated its Constitution, and not
just some statutes and rights.
For more details
on this and other human right abuses by the Australian government which go
largely UNPUBLICIZED by the lapdog establishment media, check out http://onevoice.freeservers.com/cases.htm.
As for any
similarities with the various Washington administrations that have been
violating the U.S. Constitution on their march to a One World Government,
“any similarities are purely coincidental,” as they say in Hollywood
If you believe that, there is a bridge over the Colorado river at
the bottom of the Grand Canyon we’d like to sell you.
Subverting Australian “Democracy” to “Political/Secular Elite”
PHOENIX, Nov. 5 - We received the following article from Darren Sarvis, an American patriot and a longtime TiM reader, whose contributions to the cause of truth and liberty TiM readers may recall from the days of the NATO bombing of Serbia. The historical perspective about how the Australian “democracy” has been abused by the ruling elite throughout the 20th century, penned by Peter J. Mulheron, may help American an other non-Australian readers understand why and how Mr. Joosse and Mr. Fyffe got to be so easily victimized by a government that prophases to be “democratic:”
Blackmail? (by Peter J. Mulheron)
Bono Publico Australian Taxpayers have been funding the subversion of
their own country and promoting their own unemployment by electing the
Liberal, Labor, National, Democrat and Green parties to their Parliaments.
were conned by the "political/secular trade elite" as early as
1901 when "The British Colony of the Commonwealth of Australia
Constitution Act" was passed by its short title "The
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act". Only 30% of the public
voted at the Federation Referendums. Since then, no referendum under S.128
has been held to authorize "The Crown", nor to confer
"power under the Crown" upon the Commonwealth or any parliament
the secular academic elite of "the establishment" and Parliament
repeatedly contend that the "powers and privileges of parliament were
inherited from the 1689 U.K. Bill of Rights in 1901". Validity of
that belief has had no legal standing under International Law since 1920.
As a consequence, all Acts passed in the Queen's name and decisions of the
High Court (under S.51) are invalid.
'Act' of Federation and proclamation of the Constitution was never
anything less than a method of foreign governments and corporations to
freely exploit the minerals, resources and labor of Australians for their
major political parties only hold power over the people by withholding
this knowledge and exerting laws and regulations to control them.
agreements over a quarter century and 35 double-taxation agreements with
foreign countries and corporations since 1933 have made it easy for
companies to record a local loss minimizing taxation dues, and when a
profit is made, transfer it to pacific island and Asian tax shelters.
Nation is being vilified because its policies are directed at ensuring
Australians get a fair share of the $200 billion tax free profits going
off-shore as tax revenue to ensure a secure a future, equality and
employment for all Australians. That idea poses a threat to those
plundering corporate Australia.
Means Elected Leaders
former Prime Minister comments, "We'd be out of our heads to
popularly elect a President," and the incumbent says, "A
popularly elected president would interfere with the Party system",
Australians recognize that the "free will of the people" is to
be again ignored as it was in 1901, 1920, 1945, 1953, 1967, 1970, 1975,
1980, 1989, 1997 and 1998.
significance of those years is that in 1901 a constitution was formed as a
"free-trade arrangement for the cartels and corporations to exploit
Australia and its people." In 1920 at the inauguration of the League
of Nations, Australia was accepted as a self-governing
"republic". In 1945 Australia signed membership of the U.N. with
recognition as a "republic".
further exploit Australia, l953 saw federal government adopt a U.N.
Convention on "Double Taxation", which today allows
international cartels to avoid $200 billion in annual tax debts, of which
only $945 million was recovered in 1996. This tax holiday allowed a 90%
foreign takeover of local businesses.
referendum of 1967 gave Canberra powers to legislate for "other
races" and began "multiculturalism", the UNESCO agenda.
British parliament was challenged in the U.N. in 1970 to show cause why
"Imperial Acts" which violate the UN Charter on "free
nations", were not rescinded. Despite the illegality, government was
dismissed in 1975. Also in 1975, a Royal Commission into banking fraud was
a UN document "The New International Economic Order and its
implications for Australia" was adopted "ad hoc" to
administer the economy for the transnational cartels' benefit, in the name
of "free trade".
the 1988 referendum, the Federal government ignored the public vote
against Council amalgamations and set-up of regional local government --
as the preferred infrastructure for a republic, with adoption of a U.N.
Declaration in 1989. The constitutional convention was initiated in 1997
on two only -- very narrow agendas -- whether Australia becomes or does
not become a "republic".
heavily stacked group of elected nobodies in constitutional knowledge were
elected by the public against the greater odds of company-sponsored
delegates (former politicians) vying for the electronic vote.
The 1998 Convention was chaired by a devout party faithful who will
not accept public agenda -- only that decided by the parliamentary
these things a true account of democratic government -- or a massive fraud
like the change to the Auditor-General's office in Victoria?”
Ever Met the Ugly Australian?
Oct. 3 - We received the
following reaction to our post-Olympics piece, "Ugly
Americans" Booed Down Under,” from Andrew S. MacGregor,
a TiM reader from Melbourne, Australia:
Bob! You write about the Ugly American.
Have you met the Ugly Australian?
He goes around singing "we are the champions, no time for
losers" and does other stupid things.
right, so you had some stuck up, stupid, bloody athletes.
But you also had some real ‘beauts’ down here.
Australia's problem was that it had too many yobboos in Sydney, all
behaving like spoiled children, just the same as in America.
you think (why Jelena) Dokic is threatening to leave Australia?
It's because we've become so bloody small-minded and bureaucratic.
You should see the job our 'media' are doing on her.
It really brings Newton's third law to the forefront.
forget that in the imperialistic American world of today, Australia is the
'deputy dog', and we continue to prove that by belittling behavior.
First we did it with the UK, now we do it with the USA.
may have been some Ugly Americans at the Olympic Games, but by God, there
were a lot more ugly bloody Aussies there.”
S. MacGregor, an old bald-headed bughar, a very proud Australian
Human Race Is Regressing, Bring on the Mushroom Cloud
ADELAIDE, Oct. 3 - We received the following comment from Mr. Alex Filipovic, a TiM reader from Adelaide, South Australia:
ignorance and compliance of the human race leaves me underwhelmed.
Ever since the (NATO) bombing (of Serbia) stopped, there are many,
and I mean many Serbs in this country (Australia) who still think those
governments are allies to Serbia. Now,
how stupid can these people be? Embracing
those who bomb their relatives, friends and the country, and who provided
assistance to a bunch of Neanderthal terrorists to murder the leftover
(Serbs in Kosovo)?
said for many years that the human race is regressing when it comes to
common sense and survival instincts.
Perhaps a few mushroom clouds will correct that and allow us to
start again. I fail to understand how humans consider themselves as the
superior animal on this planet.
history repeats itself time and again.
In the past evil has taken hold in countries, then continents.
Each time, the consequences have been more fearsome.
This time, the evil seems to have encompassed the entire world.
appear that the dollar rules supreme - countries, governments and leaders
everywhere have prostituted themselves to the promises of material wealth.
It seems that all and sundry have succumbed.”
Filipovic, Adelaide, Australia
We Are Living in Eschatological Times
MELBOURNE, Oct. 31
- We received the following letter from Mr. Dimitrios, a TiM reader from
Melbourne (for those who are not familiar with Melbourne, the TiM editor
has been told that it is the “second largest ‘Greek city’ in the
world - after Athens”):
the people at 'Truth in the Media' and a special thanks to the man
himself, BOB DJURDJEVIC!
is with great respect and love in Christ that I write to you to thank you,
for opening peoples eyes up to the truth. The sad thing is that many
people, or I should say the majority of people, cannot see what is really
taking place in this day and age. Sadly we are living in the
'eschatological' times and people must wake up and strive for 'salvation'.
Jesus is the only means to 'paradise'.
articles are fantastic because they show the average person that the world
does not function the way the mainstream media and our governments tell us
that it does. Anyway I could probably sit here and write you an essay, but I
don’t want to take you away from doing what you do best, telling the
BOB ever comes to Melbourne, Australia, let us know. I'm sure there would
be plenty of people that would love to hear a lecture of his. May
God bless your fruitful work! With respect,”
Dimitrios, Melbourne, Australia
To which the TiM editor replied:
you very much for your kind words of support.
You're right - we are living in eschatological times.
And as you point out, not only do just a few people realize this;
most don't even know what that term means.
So I prefer to quote a Chinese CURSE (emphasis added) with a
similar message: "May
you live in interesting times!"
We do live in interesting times...
As for my eventual visit to and a lecture in Melbourne, I would be delighted to do it on my next trip there. I have been to your beautiful city on the Yara many times, including once during a Greek festival. So I know that there will be no shortage of Greek friends, not to mention other Australians, who might want to come and attend my lecture.”
Western Australians No Longer Innocent Until Proven Guilty
PERTH, Oct. 7 - We received the following feedback about the above stories from Mr. Chris Gillham of Perth, Western Australia:
Chris Gillham, Western Australia, http://www.iinet.net.au/~property/bicycle_helmets.html
8. Brian Fyffe Denied Bail, His Daughter ReportsNov.11, 2000
SYDNEY, Nov. 11 - We’ve just received from a TiM reader in Australia the following information update to the Brian Fyffe’s case (see Item 2 in Bulletin God Save the Queen? No, God Save the Citizen!). As you can see from the excerpted e-mail message sent out today by Mr. Fyffe’s daughter, Judy Mastwyk, "One Voice- One People"- a human rights organization also mentioned in the original TiM Bulletin, this State of Victoria resident arrested on weapons and explosive charges last month, has been denied bail and ordered to remain in police custody until the next court hearing on Nov. 28:
“Dear Brigitte, (Brigitte Straulino of the “One Voice - One People”),
Unfortunately Dad's bail application was unsuccessful today,
and he has been remanded in custody until the 28th of November, 2000, at
which time he is to appear in the Sale Magistrates court again. I am not
sure whether this will be for a remand or if this is the trial date. Dad's
Barrister, Mr. Pat Cassey put forward a convincing argument but the Judge
said that he would be an unacceptable risk should he be let out on bail.
She was of the opinion that the charges against him and the evidence which
the prosecution presented were sufficient enough to sway her decision
I would like to point out that in relation to the charge sheet
the prosecution has withdrawn the charge of possession of an E category
being one machine gun. This charge has been changed to possession of a
category D longarm firearm. As I had told you previously, Dad was not in
possession of a machine gun and the Police only stated this to make Dad
look a lot worse in the eyes of the public.
So I am not sure what the next step will be. We are all a bit
disheartened at the moment. Hope to hear from you soon.”
Judy Mastwyk, Victoria
TiM Ed.: In
another e-mail, Mrs. Mastwyk adds:
“Dear Brigitte, to answer your first question, yes the house had bars and wire
mesh on the inside of the windows. The reason that this was done (by the
way this was put into place back in mid-May) was because back in 1989,
when Mum was evicted of the property whilst Dad was being held in custody,
some persons unknown who obviously knew the house was vacant broke in and
made a hell of a mess in it. That is the reason that these precautions
were taken this time.
As for the hay bales being inside the house… when we moved
everything off the farm in late May because of the threat of the sheriff
executing the warrant of possession Dad assumed that the next step the
government would take was to disconnect the power and phones to try and
force him out. He therefore had gas bottles (little 5 liter ones) water
containers (because if the power was cut he could not get water from the
water tank) and made whatever preparations were necessary for him to be
warm should they proceed with this line of forced eviction.
As for your second request about e-mail addresses for the
Herald Sun, I have a direct e-mail address to the journalist who wrote the
articles. His name is Jeremy Kelly, and his e-mail address is email@example.com.
The e-mail address to the editor is firstname.lastname@example.org.
Best of luck with getting them to print a letter as I have sent them
numerous letters and not one has been printed!
So I guess at this stage all I can do is try to stall the sale
of the property which is being sold through a local real estate agent by
public tender… Hope to hear from you soon. Dad sends his regards to you
all and said to say thanks for helping.”
Judy Mastwyk, Victoria
TiM Ed.: And just think, this man (Brian Fyffe), has been battling with the State of Victoria government since 1982 (check out the Item 2 above).
9. PM Commits Australia to International SlaveryNov. 18, 2000
BRISBANE, Queensland, Nov. 17 - We received the following comment from Brian McDermott, a TiM reader and an Australian patriot from Brisbane, Queensland:
“Prime Minister (John) Howard yesterday committed Australia
to International Communism/Socialism (now euphemistically known as
Globalism), saying that it is inevitable. (Which is) exactly in line with
the Whitlam-Hawke-Fabian policy.
FIRST POINT: Much has been said about the so-called budget
surplus. Nothing has been said about our National Foreign Debt, which has
rocketed to over -wait for it - A$404BILLION (TiM Ed.: About US$240 billion),
and climbing vertically as we speak.
SECOND POINT: Howard has committed us to so-called "Free
Trade" which means zero tariffs. Note that this is for Australia. Yet
if we want to manufacture light aircraft for example, and export them to
communist China, the Tariff payable to the Chinese government is 100%!!!
This is what we are expected to believe is the "level playing
THIRD POINT: Marxism
has always been in favor of "free trade" between countries. This
is yet another of many ways developed countries can be torn down and
reduced to third world level. Other ways are:
(a) Import diseased apples and pears from New Zealand into
Australia, so that they will inevitable contaminate the Australian crops,
which are presently relatively disease-free;
(b) At the same time, pay orchard-growers so much per tree to
bulldoze out perfectly good, healthy orange trees, and import cheap,
second class oranges and orange juice from California and Brazil;
FOURTH POINT: The Australian dairy industry is now smashed.
The next major primary industry to be smashed is the QUEENSLAND SUGAR
INDUSTRY. This is already well under way, with the introduction of cheap
sugar imports, low world sugar prices, all exacerbated by the rust disease
now rife in many areas, particularly the Mackay district.
FIFTH POINT: We are constantly being told about
"growth" (for growth's sake), and "business
confidence". Try telling that to the concrete workers, for example,
many of whom have been out of work since June.
Or to the engine re-conditioning businesses. We received a report
this week that 30 (THIRTY) engine re-conditioning firms on the NORTH SIDE
OF BRISBANE ALONE have closed their doors in the last two months!!!
Small shops and businesses across Australia are simply closing
down. Most of them do not have the money to pay BAS, GST, etc.
The Loyal Constitutional Army, apparently headquartered at
Yandina, has written to many politicians and judges, advising them that
they are guilty of committing acts of treason against the Australian
HAS ANYONE CONSIDERED WHAT IS THE "COMMON THREAD"
with these Internationalists? What is it that binds them together in a
conspiracy to undermine countries such as Australia, Rhodesia, South
Africa, and all other developed countries?”
McDermott, Hon. Secretary, PATRIOTIC MOVEMENT OF AUSTRALIA INC.
TiM Ed.: Yes, we have. To read about the “common thread,” as Mr. McDermott put it, click on the “Stitching Together the New World Order Flag,” a TiM Bulletin written one year ago - TiM GW Bulletin 99/11-4 (Nov 21, 1999) - http://www.truthinmedia.org/Bulletins99/tim99-11-4.html. You can also click on the TiM Bulletin Index (in the left frame of our home page), and then choose Global Affairs topics, for additional articles on how the “Princes of the 20th Century” (multinational companies), are conquering the world using dollars as instruments of destruction and slavery, and not just bombs and chains.
10. The Asians Are ComingNov. 18, 2000
to Open Its Immigration Floodgates to Singapore
SYDNEY, Nov. 17
- We received the following comment from Kerry Spencer-Salt B.E., LL.B (Hons),
The National Watchman, Australian Community Organization, a TiM reader
from Sydney, enclosing an article from the Sydney Morning Herald (Nov. 16
- http://www.smh.com.au/ ), excerpts
from which we also bring you below.
As you can see, Australia seems
ready to ink its own version of the infamous NAFTA deal (a “free trade
agreement” entered into in 1993 by the U.S., Canada and Mexico), and
open its immigration floodgates to Asians from Singapore:
free movement of citizens between Singapore and Australia, including
automatic residency, is on the agenda after the countries yesterday
announced they would begin formal negotiations to secure a free trade
agreement. A successful
conclusion to the deal within a year, as envisaged, will represent only
Australia's second such treaty with a nation after New Zealand.
Prime Minister, Mr,.H (John) Howard said the aim was to "put
everything in the agreement" and a senior trade official confirmed
later that "everything meant everything", including the movement
of citizens and residency arrangements. "We see it as an ambitious
attempt to open trade between two countries that are very close
economically, politically and socially," Mr. Howard said.
decision to follow the bilateral trade route with Singapore reflects a
strategic shift in trade policy away from reliance on forums such as the
World Trade Organization and APEC. It is also indicative of the stalled
global free trade movement after the collapse of the Seattle WTO round
amid wild street protests. […]
is Australia's 7th largest trade partner. Exports to Singapore were worth
A$4.9 billion in 1999-2000 while imports totaled A$4.4 billion, giving
Australia a trade surplus of A$499 million. Gold and oil sales make up the
bulk of Australia's exports to Singapore, with meat ranked third.
Principal imports were computers, boats and floating oil rigs and
telecommunications equipment in 1999-2000. Singapore sends more students
(almost 18,000) to Australia than any other country.
Zealand, with which Australia has a common market, signed its trade deal
with Singapore this week.”
TiM Ed.: For the rest of the
Sydney Morning Herald story, check out Push
for open-door deal with Singapore. Meanwhile,
here is what the TiM reader who sent us this report said about it:
have written on this issue in a report (Coming Ready or Not) that details
Australia’s present destiny: Economic change demanding cultural change;
the finality of a political change into an Asian SuperState.
report is FREE. It has been prepared in Adobe Acrobat and can be obtained
by emailing me and requesting a download. However, it is a lengthy
document of some 40 x A4 pages; the file size is 1.3 Mb and will take
about 30 minutes odd to download.”
Kerry Spencer-Salt B.E., LL.B (Hons),
The National Watchman, Australian Community Organisation, P.O. Box 136,
Surry Hills NSW 2010, Australia - www.rockroll.com.au/watchman.
AUCKLAND, New Zealand, Nov. 20 - In reaction to our pieces about the globalists’ invasion of Australia, Steve Upton, a TiM reader from the Washington state, has just sent us a heads-up about another story published in the Monday edition of the Sydney Morning Herald under a cute, though alarming, headline - “Flight of the Kiwis.” Here’s an excerpt:
Zealand's best and brightest have become refugees, fleeing a falling
currency, a lack of well-paid jobs and a country bowed by foreign debt.
Zealand of even 15 years ago is unrecognizable. It has been sold.
Globalized. Almost everything has gone to foreign owners - the banks, the
insurers, the brewers, the forest companies, the media.
those institutions regarded by many New Zealanders as public
infrastructure are no longer locally controlled. The railways and Telecom
were sold to big American companies a decade ago in an orgy of public
asset sales first ignited by David Lange's mid-'80s Labor Government and
continued by its conservative successor, the National Party. Lange has
since recanted, many times. His treasurer, Roger Douglas, never has.
economic well-being of the country is the measure of success, the great
free market experiment is now judged by many ordinary New Zealanders to
have faltered, if not failed.
foreign owners of New Zealand who have watched the New Zealand dollar
collapse to US40¢ are sweating. Some want their money out, like the
American businessmen who bought the New Zealand railway system. They cut
an organization that once employed 25,000 to 4,000, and now want to sell
the country's rail passenger services and cut their workforce to just 600.
The New Zealand economy has been slowing while Australia heads for a record four years of strong growth. About 70,000 New Zealanders are leaving a year. Half come to Australia, and are this country's largest source of migrants. They are fleeing a falling currency, a lack of well-paid jobs and a country that has pawned itself to foreigners and owes vast amounts in private overseas borrowings.” […]
For the rest of this story, click on http://www.smh.com.au/news/0011/20/features/features2.html.
TiM Ed.: “Where Globalism Treads, Trash Follows.” Same story, different milieus... South Africa, Russia, Southeast Asia, Serbia, Argentina, Romania, Brazil, Indonesia, Bulgaria… And now New Zealand and Australia, too. To read individual stories about the devastation of national economies “globalism” and “free trade” have wrought in all these countries, click on the TiM Bulletins Index in the left frame of our home page, and then select Global Affairs or individual world regions which are of interest to you.
Also check out a TiM editor's 1995 travel vignette, "Shocked by Kiwi Power."
Also, check out... Djurdjevic's WASHINGTON TIMES columns: "Christianity Under Siege," "Silence Over Persecuted Christians", "Chinese Dragon Wagging Macedonian Tail," "An Ugly Double Standard in Kosovo Conflict?", "NATO's Bullyboys", "Kosovo: Why Are We Involved?", and "Ginning Up Another Crisis"