FROM WESTERN AUSTRALIA Topic: GLOBAL AFFAIRS
WESTERN AUSTRALIA, Nov. 21 - Most people have heard something about a New World Order. Some have even read tomes about it. But few people that I have met can explain succinctly what it is. As a writer, analyst of global geopolitical affairs, political commentator, and public speaker I often come across people who use the term the "New World Order" but are at a loss to explain what it is. If asked to do so, they tend to stutter, "it's um you know ah isn't it something that started well but turned out badly?"
Well, sort of. Kind of like Hitler's Third Reich. It also promised to deliver a New World Order. Literally. If in doubt, just check out some of the Nazi era posters around Belgrade (1941). And Hitler's NWO also started well - for the downtrodden German people, starving and humiliated by victorious and arrogant WW I allies. But it ended badly, both for the German people and for millions of others around the world.
The Bolsheviks also tried to build their version of a "new world order," marketed globally as Communist International, and using slogans such as, "workers of the world unite."
But the quest for "new world orders" dates much further back than Hitler, Lenin or Stalin. In fact, it goes as far back as one man's ambition to rule another man's life. Niccolo Machiavelli, for example, wrote in "Prince" (1513): "There is nothing more difficult to plan, more doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to manage, than a creation of a new order of things."
But since power-hungry, would-be rulers of the world - from Genghis Khan, to Attila the Hun, to Napoleon, to rarely pay attention to the words of the wise, or bother to learn from history, they tend to repeat it. Usually at their own peril. Which is why every variation of a "new world order" tends to crumble eventually, invariably ending up in the dustbin of history.
The New World Order (NWO) of the 1990s, therefore, is nothing more than the latest marketing mask which uses positive words to cover up evil designs of the western NWO architects. The words, "New World Order," were first uttered in the contemporary context by the American president George Bush in 1990, when he exulted over the West's supposed victory in the Cold War with the Soviet Union. His words offered hope ("new") for a better life ("world") ahead; one which would be based on (law and) "order," rather than on raw exercise of power, which the Kremlin's "East Side Gang" used in its spheres of influence and control.
Instead, the latest edition of the NWO delivered same old "gun diplomacy" which the Soviets used, only using bigger guns and more diplomacy to mask the West Side Gang's grab for power. Like the Kremlin-based Soviet East Side Gang, the Wall Street-driven West Side Gang of globalist marauders, markets itself under the slogan, "world trade through world peace." Which is a cover for its real motto - "perpetual commerce through perpetual war."
Iraq was their first victim. It was followed Somalia, Haiti, Croatia, Bosnia, Chechnya, Albania, Kosovo, Serbia, Sudan, Afghanistan, East Timor among some NWO neo-colonial military interventions or civil war provocations. Scores of other countries around the world surrendered their national sovereignties to the NWO voluntarily or surreptitiously, after their quisling leaders took the bait of NWO dollars and "reforms," a cover term for NWO vassals' silver noose.
But "who is who" and "what is what" in this New World Order of the 1990s? They say a picture is worth a thousand words. So we invite you to build a graphic image of the NWO, an NWO quilt, its modern day flag, if you wish, with our help. All you need to do is click on the URL below; then read on:
Origins of certain powerful individuals' thirst to rule the world in modern times can be traced back to the late 18th century. Many people have written on the subject of the so-called "Illuminati" ("Enlightened"), for example, but perhaps the most succint summary of their activities in the last two centuries can be found in a 1965 speech given by a journalist and playright, Myron Fagan. The speech was was recorded and has since sold millions of copies. (The entire speech can be both read and heard at: http://www.ptialaska.net/~swampy/fagan/fagan_0.html ). Here's an excerpt:
As is the case with unscrupulous bankers and industrialists whose only motive is Greed, Rothschilds have reportedly sometimes financed both sides of a war. Such as in the case of WW II and Hitler's Third Reich, for example, one of their former clients. Nor were they alone among the Jewish bankers in doing so, according to Fagan.
It was certainly a winning strategy for war profiteers with no morals. They win no matter who loses the war. But only in a material sense. Just as the "death merchants" and their financiers of the wars of the 1990s did. Meanwhile, back to Fagan
Well, you may choose to believe all of Mr. Fagan's facts, or you may not. But the formation of the United Nations after the WW II, in which the Rockefellers played a major part, including securing a New York City property for its headquarters, is at least one of the undisputed historical facts. The U.N.'s blue colors helped masked its real "red" (commie) totalitarian agenda.
Although run entirely by unelected officials appointed at the behest of the would-be NWO rulers, this globalist House of Ill-repute has been financed entirely by the world's taxpayers. Including its various tentacles, such as the IMF, the World Bank or the World Trade Organizations.
And yet, did anyone anywhere in the supposedly "free and democratic" world of the West ever ask the taxpayers what they thought of this reincarnation of the Communist Internationale, and if they wanted to fund it?
No, Sireee Not that I've heard.
We've had referenda on just about anything; ranging from the sex lives of fruit flies, to public transit choices; to selecting the various forms of government. But NEVER EVER (!) have we been asked to vote by our "democratic" governments on whether or not we should be, or should have been paying, for the U.N. for all these years.
Ever wondered why not? Those who haven't (i.e., the taxpayers had never contemplated such travesties of our liberties, and such a brazen picking of our pockets) well, they and their offspring could be the model NWO citizens of the future.
But those who did wonder why not, must have realized that the formation of the U.N. in 1945 was the penultimate achievement of the West Side Gang. It was a pinnacle which had eluded their cruder, less perfidious, but no less brutal, Kremlin-based East Side brethren. Who were coerced into joining the U.N. party for a while. Until they "lost" the "Cold War" to a more perfidious gang. And the U.N. became a mere fig leaf for the West Side Gang's colonial ambitions.
No wonder the communist aparachiks, such as Serbia's president, Slobodan Milosevic, were also on board with the UN/NWO elite for a while. In a November 1993 article titled "Plutocracy Is Alive and Well in America," I quoted something Milosevic said to me during our first meeting at his office in Belgrade in January 1990. Here's an excerpt:
Ladies and gentlemen, the preceding lines were written more than six years ago. Yet they are every bit as true today, if not more so, as they were in November 1993.
But any student of globalism must also watch the moves of the Bilderberger Group, formed in 1954, and named after a Dutch hotel in Oosterbeek, at which the first meeting of this global-international international elite. Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, at the time an important figure in the oil industry who held major positions in Royal Dutch Petroleum (Shell Oil), and in Société Générale de Belgique, a powerful global banking corporation, was the key European sponsor of the Bilderberger idea. The Rockefeller family, whose Standard Oil and its offshoots was technically a competitor of Shell, co-sponsored the idea from the American side.
No wonder, therefore, that right from day one, the Bilderberger agenda reflected first and foremost the interests of the oil industry.
By the way, it was at the Bilderberger's 1996 meeting at a resort near Toronto (King City), that the fate of Kosovo was sealed, according to John Whitley, a British-born political analyst and Bilderberger watcher who now makes his home in Toronto (see S99-23, Day 10, Update 2, Item 3, Apr. 2). Whitley said that that's where the German government was given the lead assignment of creating, training and equipping the Kosovo Liberation Army, of which no one had heard before.
So the fact that Milosevic, an erstwhile Rockefeller protégé, knew who the boss of the NWO was, yet chose to bite the hand which fed him, and put all his political eggs in the losing Kremlin communist basket, only goes to show us how badly versed the Serbian president is in world affairs.
Meanwhile, here's a quick "NWO Quiz" for YOU. Name four individuals who are members of all three leading globalist organizations - the CFR, the Trilateral Commission, and the Bilderbergers.
Answer: David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Bill Clinton and Lou Gerstner, IBM chairman.
Do you now see which end us up in world affairs?
But the global R&R duo, the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, the Rex and the Regina of the New World Order, could not project their power through the above no-longer-so-secret societies without the help of the "Princes of the 20th Century," the leaders of the multinational corporations who stand to benefit the most from globalism and totalitarianism which it entails. Enter the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, the four prongs of the New World Order - the "Death Merchant"-Gangsters, the Banksters, the Pranksters and the Hucksters.
Here's a sampling of the "Death Merchant-Gangsters," for example. Keep in mind that in this case, as with the other three prongs of the NWO Princes, the names of the companies shown are only a representative sample. The power of the Princes is by no means limited to just those multinationals. This blight on mankind's truth and liberty involves hundreds, if not thousands, of such Princes and Princesses.
And here are some of the representatives Banksters
And some of the typical Pranksters, companies which are in the business of exporting the NWO's materialistic way of life.
Finally, here are some of the Hucksters, the globalist establishment media organizations without whose shameless lies and denials the NWO's self-serving deception of the gullible mankind could never be carried out.
Putting it all together here's the TiM version of our just stitched up New World Order quilt. Or the NWO flag, if your prefer.
As you have heard us say it before, the NWO creed is: "I believe in nothing!" Its symbol: The Almighty Dollar. Or the Euro. Or whatever other currency is in vogue. Its object of worship: The Golden Calf. Its holy shrine: Wall Street. Its motto: "Perpetual commerce through perpetual war."
Also, check out... Death of the City, Cavorting with the Enemy (Albright), Toward a new Multipolar World in the New Millennium, Albright's State, Soros' Estate, NWO "Liberals" Cancel Christmas, Stitching Together the New World Order Flag, Chinese Embassy; Slovakia; bin Laden and Bosnia, Criminals Return to Scene of Their Crimes, "Buchanan Jumps GOP Ship," "Services-based Economy Means Cheaper Labor," Truth in Media Statement on the Kosovo War, "Wither Dayton, Sprout New War?", "On the Brink of Madness", "Tragic Deja Vu's," "Seven U.S. Senators Suggest Ouster of Milosevic", "Biting the Hand That Feeds You", "A Balkan Affairs Potpourri", "Put the U.N. Justice on Trial", "International Justice 'Progresses' from Kidnapping to Murder", "Milosevic: 'A Riddle Wrapped in a Mystery'...", "Kosovo Lie Allowed to Stand", "New World Order's Inquisition in Bosnia", "Kosovo Heating Up", "Decani Monastery Under Siege?", "Murder on Wall Street", "Kosovo: 'Bosnia II', Serbia's Aztlan", "What If the Shoe Were on the Other Foot?", "Serb WW II General Exhonerated by British Archives," "Green Interstate - Not Worth American Lives", "An American Hero or Actor of the Year?" (A June '95 TiM story) and/or "Clinton arme secrètement les musulmans bosniaques", "Kocevje: Tito's Greatest Crime?", "Perfidious Albion Strikes Again, Aided by Uncle Sam", "Lift the Sanctions, Now!" (1993)
Or Djurdjevic's WASHINGTON TIMES columns: "Chinese Dragon Wagging Macedonian Tail," "An Ugly Double Standard in Kosovo Conflict?", "NATO's Bullyboys", "Kosovo: Why Are We Involved?", and "Ginning Up Another Crisis"